Hama 8900 vs Xiaomi Poco Watch

What 8900 does better (2) and where Poco Watch wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Hama · 20238900

6.9Score

2 advantages≈ $90

Xiaomi · 2022Poco Watch

7.1Score

2 advantages≈ $95

Higher score

5.1Display6.1

5.0Health tracking5.0

8.0Sports & outdoor8.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

8900Poco Watch

	8900	Poco Watch	Difference
Case size	42 mm	34.4 mm	+7.6 mm
Weight	40 g	31 g	+9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Specifications

Only differences	Hama 8900≈ $906.9	Xiaomi Poco Watch≈ $957.1
Design & durability
Case size	42 mm	39 mm
Weight	40 g	31 g
Thickness	—	10 mm
Height	—	39.1 mm
Width	—	34.4 mm
Case material	Aluminium	Plastic / polymer
Strap material	Silikon	Silikon
Water resistance	—	5 ATM
Water rating (maker)	—	5 ATM
Colours	—	Black, Blue, Ivory
Display
Screen size	1.3″	1.6″
Display technology	AMOLED	AMOLED
Panel	OLED	AMOLED
AMOLED / OLED display	Yes	Yes
Touchscreen	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	466 px	320 px
Resolution (height)	466 px	360 px
Pixel density	—	301 ppi
Refresh rate	—	60 Hz
Battery
Battery life (smartwatch mode)	—	14 days
Battery capacity	300 mAh	225 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Ion
Health sensors
Optical heart rate	Yes	Yes
Blood oxygen (SpO2)	Yes	Yes
ECG	Yes	—
Sleep tracking	Yes	Yes
Sensors	heart rate, ambient light	Accelerometer, heart rate, compass, SpO2
Sports & navigation
Built-in GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite systems	GPS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Compass	Yes	Yes
Multisport / triathlon mode	Yes	Yes
Connectivity
NFC payments	—	Yes
LTE (cellular)	—	No
eSIM	—	No
Bluetooth	5.3	5
Smart features
Speaker	—	No
Voice assistant	Yes	—
Platform
Operating system	—	Proprietary OS
Platform	—	Proprietary
Works with	iOS, Android	—