NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. 9000 vs Wach 7010

Hama 9000 vs Hama Wach 7010

What 9000 does better (3) and where Wach 7010 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Hama 9000
Hama · 20259000
9.1Score
3 advantages≈ $120
vs
Hama Wach 7010
Hama · 2024Wach 7010
9.1Score
1 advantage≈ $70
9.1Display9.1
4.9Health tracking4.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

9000Wach 7010
47 × 471446 × 4612
9000Wach 7010Difference
Case size47 mm46 mm+1 mm
Thickness14 mm12 mm+2 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 9000 better than Wach 7010?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)8 days vs 6 days+33%
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 3 ATM+67%
  3. Battery capacity450 mAh vs 300 mAh+50%

Why is Wach 7010 better than 9000?

  1. Thickness14 mm vs 12 mm+17%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare