NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. 9000 vs FW51

Hama 9000 vs Maxcom FW51

What 9000 does better (5) and where FW51 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Hama 9000
Hama · 20259000
9.1Score
5 advantages≈ $120
Higher score
vs
Maxcom FW51
Maxcom · 2023FW51
3.9Score
0 advantages≈ $140
9.1Display2.2
4.9Health tracking4.9

Why is 9000 better than FW51?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · FW51: No
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)8 days vs 7 days+14%
  3. Battery capacity450 mAh vs 130 mAh3.5×
  4. Screen size1.43″ vs 1.09″+31%
  5. Resolution (width)466 px vs 240 px+94%

Why is FW51 better than 9000?

FW51 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare