NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Arion vs FW51

Hama Arion vs Maxcom FW51

What Arion does better (4) and where FW51 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Hama Arion
Hama · 2026Arion
7.2Score
4 advantages≈ $110
Higher score
vs
Maxcom FW51
Maxcom · 2023FW51
3.9Score
1 advantage≈ $140
6.7Display2.2
4.9Health tracking4.9

Why is Arion better than FW51?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · FW51: No
  2. Battery capacity350 mAh vs 130 mAh2.7×
  3. Screen size1.32″ vs 1.09″+21%
  4. Resolution (width)466 px vs 240 px+94%

Why is FW51 better than Arion?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)6 days vs 7 days+17%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare