vs
4.7Display7.0
5.5Health tracking5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Fit Watch 5000Band 11
| Fit Watch 5000 | Band 11 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 37 mm | 42.6 mm | −5.6 mm |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 9 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 35 g | 17 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Fit Watch 5000 better than Band 11?
Fit Watch 5000 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Band 11 better than Fit Watch 5000?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)7 days vs 14 days2×
- Weight35 g vs 17 g2.1×
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Fit Watch 5000: Yes
- Thickness10 mm vs 9 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 43 mm |
| Weight | 35 g | 17 g |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 255 mm | — |
| Width | 37 mm | — |
| Case material | Stainless steel | — |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | Fluorelastomer |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.65″ | 1.62″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | LCD | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 286 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 482 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | 14 days |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| HRV tracking | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, accelerometer, ambient light |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 6 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
