Dimensions
Size comparison
102 4G110
| 102 4G | 110 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 118.2 mm | 115.5 mm | +2.7 mm |
| Width | 50.2 mm | 49.5 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm | 14 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 84 g | 78 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 102 4G better than 110?
- LTE (cellular)Yes · 110: No
Why is 110 better than 102 4G?
- Weight84.2 g vs 78 g+8%
- Thickness14.3 mm vs 14 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 84.2 g | 78 g |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm | 14 mm |
| Height | 118.2 mm | 115.5 mm |
| Width | 50.2 mm | 49.5 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Red, Purple | Black, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 100 ppi | 100 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| RAM | — | 0.004 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | RTOS OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Chipset | Unisoc 8910 FF-S | — |
