Dimensions
Size comparison
101 4G102 4G
| 101 4G | 102 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 118.2 mm | 118.2 mm | = |
| Width | 50.2 mm | 50.2 mm | = |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm | 14.3 mm | = |
| Weight | 84 g | 84 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 101 4G better than 102 4G?
101 4G has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 102 4G better than 101 4G?
102 4G has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 83.5 g | 84.2 g |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm | 14.3 mm |
| Height | 118.2 mm | 118.2 mm |
| Width | 50.2 mm | 50.2 mm |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Blue, Red | Dark Blue, Red, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 100 ppi | 100 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc 8910 FF-S | Unisoc 8910 FF-S |
