vs
3.8Display4.0
6.5Smart features6.5
Why is 101 4G better than 108 4G (2024)?
- Weight83.5 g vs 93 g+11%
Why is 108 4G (2024) better than 101 4G?
- Resolution (width)120 px vs 240 px2×
- Pixel density100 ppi vs 200 ppi2×
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 83.5 g | 93 g |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm | — |
| Height | 118.2 mm | — |
| Width | 50.2 mm | — |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Blue, Red | Blue, Cyan, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 100 ppi | 200 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc 8910 FF-S | — |
