vs
6.1Display8.6
5.5Health tracking4.9
Why is Band 10 better than Ecowatch 4?
- Weight15 g vs 45 g3×
Why is Ecowatch 4 better than Band 10?
- Screen size1.47″ vs 1.85″+26%
- Resolution (width)194 px vs 390 px2×
- Battery capacity180 mAh vs 260 mAh+44%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 43 mm | — |
| Weight | 15 g | 45 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | — |
| Height | 43.4 mm | — |
| Width | 24.9 mm | — |
| Strap material | Fluorelastomer | Silikon |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.47″ | 1.85″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Always-on display | Yes | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 194 px | 390 px |
| Resolution (height) | 368 px | 450 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 8 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 180 mAh | 260 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Charging | kabellos, magnetische Ladeschale | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer, ambient light | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
