Why is Band 10 better than Fit FW42?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Fit FW42: No
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)8 days vs 7 days+14%
Why is Fit FW42 better than Band 10?
Fit FW42 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 43 mm | — |
| Weight | 15 g | — |
| Thickness | 9 mm | — |
| Height | 43.4 mm | — |
| Width | 24.9 mm | — |
| Case material | — | Stainless steel |
| Strap material | Fluorelastomer | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.47″ | — |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | AMOLED | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Always-on display | Yes | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 194 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 368 px | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 8 days | 7 days |
| Battery capacity | 180 mAh | 180 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Charging | kabellos, magnetische Ladeschale | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer, ambient light | heart rate |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
