vs
7.0Display7.7
5.5Health tracking5.5
8.1Build & durability2.3
Why is Band 11 Pro better than Ice Fit RT 3.0?
- Weight18 g vs 200 g11.1×
Why is Ice Fit RT 3.0 better than Band 11 Pro?
- Resolution (width)286 px vs 390 px+36%
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 350 mAh+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 44 mm | — |
| Weight | 18 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | — |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Strap material | Fluorelastomer | Silikon |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.62″ | — |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Always-on display | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 286 px | 390 px |
| Resolution (height) | 482 px | 450 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 14 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 350 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| HRV tracking | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer, ambient light | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 6 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS |
Related comparisons
vs
Huawei Band 11 ProvsKodak SW-7204 Smartwatchvs
Huawei Band 11 ProvsGarett Edge Smartwatch Herren, Edelstahl, Gorilla Glass
vsAmazfit Helio CorevsHuawei Band 11 Pro
vsIce Watch Fit 1.0vsHuawei Band 11 Pro9.48.9
vs
Huawei Watch Fit 4vsIce Watch Ice Fit RT 3.07.06.4vsIce Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsKodak SW-7204 Smartwatch