vs
9.2Display8.8
5.5Health tracking5.5
Why is Watch Fit 3 better than Fit 1.0?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 5 days2×
- Water resistance5 ATM vs 3 ATM+67%
- Screen size1.82″ vs 1.78″+2%
- Resolution (width)480 px vs 368 px+30%
- Thickness9.9 mm vs 12 mm+21%
Why is Fit 1.0 better than Watch Fit 3?
Fit 1.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 26 g | — |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 12 mm |
| Height | 43.2 mm | — |
| Width | 36.3 mm | — |
| Case material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Mineralglas Mineralglas |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 3 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 5 ATM | 30 m / 3 bar / 3 ATM |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.82″ | 1.78″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 480 px | 368 px |
| Resolution (height) | 408 px | 448 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 10 days | 5 days |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer, ambient light | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietär |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Huawei Watch Fit 4vsHuawei Watch Fit 37.09.2
vsHuawei Watch Fit 5vsHuawei Watch Fit 37.69.2vs
Huawei Watch Fit 3vsKodak SW-7204 Smartwatchvs
Huawei Watch Fit 3vsGarett Edge Smartwatch Herren, Edelstahl, Gorilla Glass
vsAmazfit Helio CorevsHuawei Watch Fit 3
vsIce Watch Fit 1.0vsKodak SW-7204 Smartwatch