vs
8.0Display6.3
5.5Health tracking5.5
Why is Watch Fit 4 better than VG52 Pro 2025?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 3 days3.3×
- Screen size1.82″ vs 1.43″+27%
Why is VG52 Pro 2025 better than Watch Fit 4?
- Battery capacity400 mAh vs 750 mAh+88%
- Resolution (width)408 px vs 466 px+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 43 mm | — |
| Weight | 27 g | — |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | — |
| Height | 43 mm | — |
| Width | 38 mm | — |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM | — |
| Colours | Black, Silver | Silver, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.82″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 408 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 480 px | 466 px |
| Pixel density | 347 ppi | — |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 10 days | 3 days |
| Battery capacity | 400 mAh | 750 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Charging | Ladestation, kabellos | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2, compass, barometer | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Barometric altimeter | Yes | — |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | Yes | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | No | — |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 1 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Calls from the wrist | Yes | — |
| Speaker | Yes | — |
| Music on the watch | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | Android, iOS | — |
