vs
8.8Display4.4
5.5Health tracking5.5
Why is Fit 1.0 better than Neo 2 Band?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Neo 2 Band: No
- Screen size1.78″ vs 1.57″+13%
- Resolution (width)368 px vs 320 px+15%
Why is Neo 2 Band better than Fit 1.0?
- Thickness12 mm vs 10 mm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Thickness | 12 mm | 10 mm |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Lens / cover glass | Mineralglas Mineralglas | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Water resistance | 3 ATM | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 30 m / 3 bar / 3 ATM | — |
| Colours | Black | Anthracite |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.78″ | 1.57″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | — |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 368 px | 320 px |
| Resolution (height) | 448 px | 200 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 5 days | 5 days |
| Battery capacity | — | 250 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| LED flashlight | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietär | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
