vs
8.8Display6.3
Why is Fit 1.0 better than Moto Watch Fit?
- Resolution (width)368 px vs 348 px+6%
Why is Moto Watch Fit better than Fit 1.0?
- Water resistance3 ATM vs 5 ATM+67%
- Screen size1.78″ vs 1.9″+7%
- Thickness12 mm vs 9.5 mm+26%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 44 mm |
| Weight | — | 25 g |
| Thickness | 12 mm | 9.5 mm |
| Height | — | 44.5 mm |
| Width | — | 38 mm |
| Case material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | Mineralglas Mineralglas | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Water resistance | 3 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Water rating (maker) | 30 m / 3 bar / 3 ATM | — |
| Colours | Black | Trekking Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.78″ | 1.9″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | OLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 368 px | 348 px |
| Resolution (height) | 448 px | 442 px |
| Pixel density | — | 296 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 5 days | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, PPG |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietär | RTOS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
