Ice Watch Fit 1.0 vs S&T Design Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren
What Fit 1.0 does better (0) and where Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Display9.4
Why is Fit 1.0 better than Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren?
Fit 1.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren better than Fit 1.0?
- Screen size1.78″ vs 1.85″+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 46 mm |
| Thickness | 12 mm | — |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Lens / cover glass | Mineralglas Mineralglas | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Water resistance | 3 ATM | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 30 m / 3 bar / 3 ATM | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.78″ | 1.85″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 368 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 448 px | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 5 days | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietär | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS |
Related comparisons
vs
Ice Watch Fit 1.0vsKodak SW-7204 Smartwatch
vs
Amazfit Helio CorevsIce Watch Fit 1.0
vs
Ice Watch Fit 1.0vsBea-Fon Watch 1019.39.4
vs
Ice Watch Fit 1.0vsHuawei Watch Fit 39.39.2
vs
Xiaomi Smart Band 10 ProvsS&T Design Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren
vs
Xiaomi Smart Band 10vsS&T Design Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren
