vs
8.8Display7.4
5.5Health tracking5.5
Why is Fit 1.0 better than Smart Band 10?
- Resolution (width)368 px vs 212 px+74%
- Screen size1.78″ vs 1.72″+3%
Why is Smart Band 10 better than Fit 1.0?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)5 days vs 9 days+80%
- Water resistance3 ATM vs 5 ATM+67%
- Thickness12 mm vs 11 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 47 mm |
| Weight | — | 27 g |
| Thickness | 12 mm | 11 mm |
| Height | — | 48 mm |
| Width | — | 22.5 mm |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Lens / cover glass | Mineralglas Mineralglas | 2.5D-Glas |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Water resistance | 3 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 30 m / 3 bar / 3 ATM | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.78″ | 1.72″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Always-on display | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 368 px | 212 px |
| Resolution (height) | 448 px | 520 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 5 days | 9 days |
| Battery capacity | — | 233 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.4 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietär | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
