vs
9.7Display9.1
Why is Pulse better than Moto Watch 2?
- Screen size1.96″ vs 1.43″+37%
- Resolution (width)410 px vs 396 px+4%
Why is Moto Watch 2 better than Pulse?
- Battery capacity350 mAh vs 450 mAh+29%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 47 mm |
| Thickness | — | 12 mm |
| Case material | — | Stainless steel |
| Lens / cover glass | Gorilla Glas | Gorilla Glas 3 |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.96″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | OLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 410 px | 396 px |
| Resolution (height) | 502 px | 396 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 350 mAh | 450 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | accelerometer, ambient light |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 1 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | Android |
