vs
4.6Display3.3
3.9Smart features3.9
Why is Prowatch ZN better than 105 (2023)?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · 105 (2023): No
- Resolution (width)466 px vs 120 px3.9×
- Pixel density326 ppi vs 111 ppi2.9×
Why is 105 (2023) better than Prowatch ZN?
- Battery capacity350 mAh vs 1,000 mAh2.9×
- Screen size1.43″ vs 1.8″+26%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 78.7 g |
| Thickness | — | 14.5 mm |
| Height | — | 115.1 mm |
| Width | — | 49.4 mm |
| Lens / cover glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Black, Tarnish | Red Terracotta, Cyan, Charcoal |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | AMOLED | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 326 ppi | 111 ppi |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 350 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
