vs
3.3Display3.8
3.9Smart features3.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
105 (2023)105 (2024)
| 105 (2023) | 105 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 115.1 mm | 115.5 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Width | 49.4 mm | 49.5 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 14 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 79 g | 78 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 105 (2023) better than 105 (2024)?
- Pixel density111 ppi vs 100 ppi+11%
Why is 105 (2024) better than 105 (2023)?
- Screen size1.8″ vs 2″+11%
- Thickness14.5 mm vs 14 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 78.7 g | 77.5 g |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 14 mm |
| Height | 115.1 mm | 115.5 mm |
| Width | 49.4 mm | 49.5 mm |
| Colours | Red Terracotta, Cyan, Charcoal | Black, Blue, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 2″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 111 ppi | 100 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| RAM | — | 0.004 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | RTOS OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
