NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. 105 (2023) vs Galaxy Watch FE

Nokia 105 (2023) vs Samsung Galaxy Watch FE

What 105 (2023) does better (2) and where Galaxy Watch FE wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Nokia 105 (2023)
Nokia · 2023105 (2023)
4.0Score
2 advantages≈ $55
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
Samsung · 2024Galaxy Watch FE
8.3Score
9 advantages≈ $110
Higher score
3.3Display5.9
3.9Smart features7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

105 (2023)Galaxy Watch FE
49.4 × 115.114.539.3 × 40.49.8
105 (2023)Galaxy Watch FEDifference
Height115.1 mm40.4 mm+74.7 mm
Width49.4 mm39.3 mm+10.1 mm
Thickness14.5 mm9.8 mm+4.7 mm
Weight79 g27 g+52 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 105 (2023) better than Galaxy Watch FE?

  1. Screen size1.8″ vs 1.2″+50%
  2. Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 247 mAh4×

Why is Galaxy Watch FE better than 105 (2023)?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · 105 (2023): Yes
  2. Weight78.7 g vs 26.6 g3×
  3. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · 105 (2023): Yes
  4. NFC paymentsNo · 105 (2023): Yes
  5. LTE (cellular)No · 105 (2023): Yes
  6. Resolution (width)120 px vs 396 px3.3×
  7. Pixel density111 ppi vs 330 ppi3×
  8. eSIMNo · 105 (2023): Yes
  9. Thickness14.5 mm vs 9.8 mm+48%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare