vs
2.0Build & durability7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
R8851112001RedMagic Watch
| R8851112001 | RedMagic Watch | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 45 mm | 46.4 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 13.3 mm | 12.4 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 150 g | 30 g | +120 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is R8851112001 better than RedMagic Watch?
R8851112001 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is RedMagic Watch better than R8851112001?
- Weight150 g vs 30 g5×
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · R8851112001: Yes
- Water resistance3 ATM vs 5 ATM+67%
- Thickness13.3 mm vs 12.4 mm+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 45 mm | 48 mm |
| Weight | 150 g | 30 g |
| Thickness | 13.3 mm | 12.4 mm |
| Height | — | 47.8 mm |
| Width | — | 46.4 mm |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | Mineralglas | — |
| Strap material | Leder | — |
| Water resistance | 3 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Water rating (maker) | 3 ATM | — |
| Colours | Black, Silver | Black, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.39″ |
| Display technology | — | AMOLED |
| Panel | — | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 454 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 454 px |
| Pixel density | — | 326 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 420 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | QZSS |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
