vs
4.1Display2.5
5.0Health tracking5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
FW55 Aurum ProWatch 3
| FW55 Aurum Pro | Watch 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 255 mm | 45 mm | +210 mm |
| Width | 38 mm | 37 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 11.5 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Weight | 46 g | 40 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is FW55 Aurum Pro better than Watch 3?
- Built-in GPSYes · Watch 3: No
- Thickness10 mm vs 11.5 mm+15%
Why is Watch 3 better than FW55 Aurum Pro?
- Weight46 g vs 40 g+15%
- Screen size1.7″ vs 1.8″+6%
- Battery capacity230 mAh vs 340 mAh+48%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 45 mm |
| Weight | 46 g | 40 g |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 11.5 mm |
| Height | 255 mm | 45 mm |
| Width | 38 mm | 37 mm |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | — | Black, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.7″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | — | LCD |
| Panel | IPS | IPS LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 280 px | 286 px |
| Pixel density | — | 207 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 6 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 230 mAh | 340 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
