vs
Why is Moto Watch Fit better than E Circle?
- Weight25 g vs 32 g+28%
Why is E Circle better than Moto Watch Fit?
E Circle has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 44 mm | — |
| Weight | 25 g | 32 g |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | — |
| Height | 44.5 mm | — |
| Width | 38 mm | — |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Lens / cover glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 5 m |
| Colours | Trekking Green | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.9″ | — |
| Display technology | OLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 348 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 442 px | — |
| Pixel density | 296 ppi | — |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 188 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, PPG | SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | — |
| LTE (cellular) | No | — |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | RTOS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Moto Watch FitvsKnauermann Neo 2 Band5.24.9
vs
Motorola Moto Watch FitvsKodak SW-7204 Smartwatch
vs
Motorola Moto Watch FitvsGarett Edge Smartwatch Herren, Edelstahl, Gorilla Glass
vs
Amazfit Helio CorevsMotorola Moto Watch Fit
vs
Fitbit Charge 6vsMotorola Moto Watch Fit5.55.2
vs
Fitbit Charge 6vsZepp E Circle
