vs
Why is Moto Watch Fit better than E Circle?
- Weight25 g vs 32 g+28%
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 188 mAh+60%
Why is E Circle better than Moto Watch Fit?
E Circle has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 44 mm | — |
| Weight | 25 g | 32 g |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | — |
| Height | 44.5 mm | — |
| Width | 38 mm | — |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Lens / cover glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Strap material | Textil, Nylon | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM | 5 m |
| Colours | Trekking Green | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.9″ | — |
| Display technology | OLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Always-on display | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 348 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 442 px | — |
| Pixel density | 296 ppi | — |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 188 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, PPG | SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | — |
| LTE (cellular) | No | — |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | RTOS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | Android | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Moto Watch FitvsKodak SW-7204 Smartwatchvs
Motorola Moto Watch FitvsS&T Design Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren
vsAmazfit Helio CorevsMotorola Moto Watch Fitvs
Motorola Moto Watch FitvsKnauermann Neo 2 Band5.34.9vs
Motorola Moto Watch FitvsGarett Quantum Smartwatch
vs
Fitbit Inspire 3vsZepp E Circle