vs
3.8Display3.3
3.9Smart features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
105 (2024)110 4G (2023)
| 105 (2024) | 110 4G (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 115.5 mm | 121.5 mm | −6 mm |
| Width | 49.5 mm | 50 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 14.4 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 78 g | 94 g | −17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 105 (2024) better than 110 4G (2023)?
- Weight77.5 g vs 94.5 g+22%
- Screen size2″ vs 1.8″+11%
- Thickness14 mm vs 14.4 mm+3%
Why is 110 4G (2023) better than 105 (2024)?
- LTE (cellular)No · 105 (2024): Yes
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
- Pixel density100 ppi vs 111 ppi+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 77.5 g | 94.5 g |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 14.4 mm |
| Height | 115.5 mm | 121.5 mm |
| Width | 49.5 mm | 50 mm |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Purple | Midnight Blue, Arctic Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 100 ppi | 111 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| RAM | 0.004 GB | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | RTOS OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
