vs
3.3Display3.3
6.5Smart features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
105 4G (2023)110 4G (2023)
| 105 4G (2023) | 110 4G (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 121.5 mm | 121.5 mm | = |
| Width | 50 mm | 50 mm | = |
| Thickness | 14.4 mm | 14.4 mm | = |
| Weight | 93 g | 94 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 105 4G (2023) better than 110 4G (2023)?
105 4G (2023) has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 110 4G (2023) better than 105 4G (2023)?
110 4G (2023) has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 93 g | 94.5 g |
| Thickness | 14.4 mm | 14.4 mm |
| Height | 121.5 mm | 121.5 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 50 mm |
| Colours | Charcoal, Ocean Blue | Midnight Blue, Arctic Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 111 ppi | 111 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
