NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. 105 4G vs Galaxy Watch FE

Nokia 105 4G vs Samsung Galaxy Watch FE

What 105 4G does better (2) and where Galaxy Watch FE wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Nokia 105 4G
Nokia · 2021105 4G
5.0Score
2 advantages≈ $45
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
Samsung · 2024Galaxy Watch FE
8.3Score
8 advantages≈ $110
Higher score
3.3Display5.9
6.5Smart features7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

105 4GGalaxy Watch FE
50 × 12114.539.3 × 40.49.8
105 4GGalaxy Watch FEDifference
Height121 mm40.4 mm+80.6 mm
Width50 mm39.3 mm+10.7 mm
Thickness14.5 mm9.8 mm+4.7 mm
Weight80 g27 g+54 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 105 4G better than Galaxy Watch FE?

  1. Screen size1.8″ vs 1.2″+50%
  2. Battery capacity1,020 mAh vs 247 mAh4.1×

Why is Galaxy Watch FE better than 105 4G?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · 105 4G: Yes
  2. Weight80.2 g vs 26.6 g3×
  3. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · 105 4G: Yes
  4. NFC paymentsNo · 105 4G: Yes
  5. Resolution (width)120 px vs 396 px3.3×
  6. Pixel density111 ppi vs 330 ppi3×
  7. eSIMNo · 105 4G: Yes
  8. Thickness14.5 mm vs 9.8 mm+48%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare