vs
3.3Display4.0
6.5Smart features6.5
Why is 106 4G (2023) better than 110 4G (2024)?
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+45%
Why is 110 4G (2024) better than 106 4G (2023)?
- Resolution (width)120 px vs 240 px2×
- Screen size1.8″ vs 2″+11%
- Pixel density111 ppi vs 200 ppi+80%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 93 g | — |
| Thickness | 14.4 mm | — |
| Height | 121.5 mm | — |
| Width | 50 mm | — |
| Colours | Charcoal, Ocean Blue | Blue, Titanium |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 2″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 111 ppi | 200 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| RAM | — | 0.1 GB |
