vs
3.5Display3.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Watch 6010106 4G (2023)
| Watch 6010 | 106 4G (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 255 mm | 121.5 mm | +133.5 mm |
| Width | 37 mm | 50 mm | −13 mm |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 14.4 mm | −4.4 mm |
| Weight | 35 g | 93 g | −58 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Watch 6010 better than 106 4G (2023)?
- Built-in GPSYes · 106 4G (2023): No
- Weight35 g vs 93 g2.7×
- Thickness10 mm vs 14.4 mm+44%
Why is 106 4G (2023) better than Watch 6010?
- Screen size1.65″ vs 1.8″+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 35 g | 93 g |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 14.4 mm |
| Height | 255 mm | 121.5 mm |
| Width | 37 mm | 50 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | — |
| Colours | — | Charcoal, Ocean Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.65″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | LCD | IPS LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 160 px |
| Pixel density | — | 111 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | Yes |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
