vs
3.3Display6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
106 4G (2023)GTR 3 Pro
| 106 4G (2023) | GTR 3 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 50 mm | 45 mm | +5 mm |
| Thickness | 14.4 mm | 10.7 mm | +3.7 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 106 4G (2023) better than GTR 3 Pro?
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 260 mAh5.6×
- Screen size1.8″ vs 1.43″+26%
Why is GTR 3 Pro better than 106 4G (2023)?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · 106 4G (2023): Yes
- Resolution (width)120 px vs 466 px3.9×
- Thickness14.4 mm vs 10.7 mm+35%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 45 mm |
| Weight | 93 g | — |
| Thickness | 14.4 mm | 10.7 mm |
| Height | 121.5 mm | — |
| Width | 50 mm | — |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Colours | Charcoal, Ocean Blue | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 466 px |
| Pixel density | 111 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 7 days |
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 260 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | — | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | — |
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
