NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. 110 4G (2023) vs Galaxy Watch8 Classic

Nokia 110 4G (2023) vs Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic

What 110 4G (2023) does better (2) and where Galaxy Watch8 Classic wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Nokia 110 4G (2023)
Nokia · 2023110 4G (2023)
5.0Score
2 advantages≈ $45
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Watch8 Classic
8.3Score
8 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
3.3Display9.1
6.5Smart features7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

110 4G (2023)Galaxy Watch8 Classic
50 × 121.514.446 × 46.410.6
110 4G (2023)Galaxy Watch8 ClassicDifference
Height121.5 mm46.4 mm+75.1 mm
Width50 mm46 mm+4 mm
Thickness14.4 mm10.6 mm+3.8 mm
Weight94 g64 g+31 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 110 4G (2023) better than Galaxy Watch8 Classic?

  1. Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 445 mAh3.3×
  2. Screen size1.8″ vs 1.34″+34%

Why is Galaxy Watch8 Classic better than 110 4G (2023)?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · 110 4G (2023): Yes
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · 110 4G (2023): Yes
  3. NFC paymentsNo · 110 4G (2023): Yes
  4. Weight94.5 g vs 63.5 g+49%
  5. Resolution (width)120 px vs 438 px3.6×
  6. Pixel density111 ppi vs 327 ppi2.9×
  7. eSIMNo · 110 4G (2023): Yes
  8. Thickness14.4 mm vs 10.6 mm+36%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare