NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. 110 4G vs Galaxy Watch6 Classic

Nokia 110 4G vs Samsung Galaxy Watch6 Classic

What 110 4G does better (2) and where Galaxy Watch6 Classic wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Nokia 110 4G
Nokia · 2021110 4G
5.0Score
2 advantages≈ $55
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch6 Classic
Samsung · 2023Galaxy Watch6 Classic
8.4Score
8 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
3.3Display9.1
6.5Smart features7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

110 4GGalaxy Watch6 Classic
50 × 12114.546.5 × 46.510.9
110 4GGalaxy Watch6 ClassicDifference
Height121 mm46.5 mm+74.5 mm
Width50 mm46.5 mm+3.5 mm
Thickness14.5 mm10.9 mm+3.6 mm
Weight84 g59 g+26 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 110 4G better than Galaxy Watch6 Classic?

  1. Battery capacity1,020 mAh vs 425 mAh2.4×
  2. Screen size1.8″ vs 1.5″+20%

Why is Galaxy Watch6 Classic better than 110 4G?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · 110 4G: Yes
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · 110 4G: Yes
  3. NFC paymentsNo · 110 4G: Yes
  4. Resolution (width)120 px vs 480 px4×
  5. Pixel density111 ppi vs 453 ppi4.1×
  6. Weight84.5 g vs 59 g+43%
  7. eSIMNo · 110 4G: Yes
  8. Thickness14.5 mm vs 10.9 mm+33%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare