NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. CMF Watch 3 Pro vs BT80

Nothing CMF Watch 3 Pro vs Oukitel BT80

What CMF Watch 3 Pro does better (3) and where BT80 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Nothing CMF Watch 3 Pro
Nothing · 2025CMF Watch 3 Pro
6.0Score
3 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
vs
Oukitel BT80
Oukitel · 2024BT80
5.4Score
2 advantages≈ $75
5.0Display8.8
5.0Health tracking5.0
8.0Sports & outdoor2.1
4.8Smart features3.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

CMF Watch 3 ProBT80
47 × 4714.444.5 × 52.714.2
CMF Watch 3 ProBT80Difference
Height47 mm52.7 mm−5.7 mm
Width47 mm44.5 mm+2.5 mm
Thickness14.4 mm14.2 mm+0.2 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is CMF Watch 3 Pro better than BT80?

  1. Built-in GPSYes · BT80: No
  2. Resolution (width)466 px vs 410 px+14%
  3. Pixel density326 ppi vs 304 ppi+7%

Why is BT80 better than CMF Watch 3 Pro?

  1. Screen size1.43″ vs 2.13″+49%
  2. Battery capacity350 mAh vs 1,000 mAh2.9×
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare