NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. CMF Watch Pro vs iQOO Watch GT

Nothing CMF Watch Pro vs Vivo iQOO Watch GT

What CMF Watch Pro does better (4) and where iQOO Watch GT wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Nothing CMF Watch Pro
Nothing · 2023CMF Watch Pro
5.6Score
4 advantages≈ $45
vs
Vivo iQOO Watch GT
Vivo · 2024iQOO Watch GT
6.7Score
4 advantages≈ $65
Higher score
7.1Display8.7
5.0Health tracking5.0
3.9Smart features9.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

CMF Watch ProiQOO Watch GT
39.9 × 46.911.439.6 × 45.811.2
CMF Watch ProiQOO Watch GTDifference
Height46.9 mm45.8 mm+1.1 mm
Width39.9 mm39.6 mm+0.3 mm
Thickness11.4 mm11.2 mm+0.2 mm
Weight31 g33 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is CMF Watch Pro better than iQOO Watch GT?

  1. Weight31.1 g vs 33 g+6%
  2. Screen size1.96″ vs 1.85″+6%
  3. Resolution (width)410 px vs 390 px+5%
  4. Pixel density331 ppi vs 322 ppi+3%

Why is iQOO Watch GT better than CMF Watch Pro?

  1. NFC paymentsNo · CMF Watch Pro: Yes
  2. LTE (cellular)No · CMF Watch Pro: Yes
  3. eSIMNo · CMF Watch Pro: Yes
  4. Battery capacity340 mAh vs 505 mAh+49%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare