NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. BT103 vs Galaxy Watch Ultra

Oukitel BT103 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra

What BT103 does better (2) and where Galaxy Watch Ultra wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Oukitel BT103
Oukitel · 2024BT103
4.5Score
2 advantages
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra
Samsung · 2024Galaxy Watch Ultra
9.2Score
10 advantages≈ $230
Higher score
4.0Display9.0
5.0Health tracking8.6
2.5Smart features7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

BT103Galaxy Watch Ultra
40 × 49.510.947.4 × 47.412.1
BT103Galaxy Watch UltraDifference
Height49.5 mm47.4 mm+2.1 mm
Width40 mm47.4 mm−7.4 mm
Thickness10.9 mm12.1 mm−1.2 mm
Weight100 g60 g+40 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is BT103 better than Galaxy Watch Ultra?

  1. Screen size1.91″ vs 1.5″+27%
  2. Thickness10.9 mm vs 12.1 mm+11%

Why is Galaxy Watch Ultra better than BT103?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · BT103: Yes
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · BT103: Yes
  3. NFC paymentsNo · BT103: Yes
  4. LTE (cellular)No · BT103: Yes
  5. Weight100 g vs 60.5 g+65%
  6. eSIMNo · BT103: Yes
  7. SpeakerNo · BT103: Yes
  8. Battery capacity300 mAh vs 590 mAh+97%
  9. Resolution (width)320 px vs 480 px+50%
  10. Pixel density260 ppi vs 327 ppi+26%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare