NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Grit X2 vs Race 2

Polar Grit X2 vs Suunto Race 2

What Grit X2 does better (2) and where Race 2 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Polar Grit X2
Polar · 2025Grit X2
4.4Score
2 advantages≈ $520
vs
Suunto Race 2
Suunto · 2025Race 2
9.0Score
5 advantages≈ $510
Higher score
6.4Display6.3
3.0Battery life8.0
8.3Health tracking4.9
2.9Sports & outdoor6.4
4.0Build & durability8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Grit X2Race 2
44.7 × 44.712.549 × 4912.5
Grit X2Race 2Difference
Height44.7 mm49 mm−4.3 mm
Width44.7 mm49 mm−4.3 mm
Thickness12.5 mm12.5 mm=
Weight62 g76 g−14 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Grit X2 better than Race 2?

  1. Weight62 g vs 76 g+23%
  2. Pixel density325 ppi vs 311 ppi+5%

Why is Race 2 better than Grit X2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)8 days vs 18 days2.2×
  2. GPS battery life25 h vs 65 h2.6×
  3. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  4. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.5″+17%
  5. Resolution (width)416 px vs 466 px+12%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare