NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pacer vs 9 Peak Pro

Polar Pacer vs Suunto 9 Peak Pro

What Pacer does better (1) and where 9 Peak Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Polar Pacer
Polar · 2022Pacer
3.7Score
1 advantage≈ $260
vs
Suunto 9 Peak Pro
Suunto · 20229 Peak Pro
6.1Score
7 advantages≈ $210
Higher score
2.3Display3.4
3.5Battery life7.5
2.1Health tracking4.9
2.0Sports & outdoor2.4
4.3Build & durability9.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pacer9 Peak Pro
45 × 4511.543 × 4310.3
Pacer9 Peak ProDifference
Height45 mm43 mm+2 mm
Width45 mm43 mm+2 mm
Thickness11.5 mm10.3 mm+1.2 mm
Weight40 g64 g−24 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pacer better than 9 Peak Pro?

  1. Weight40 g vs 64 g+60%

Why is 9 Peak Pro better than Pacer?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)6.5 days vs 21 days3.2×
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. GPS battery life32 h vs 40 h+25%
  4. TouchscreenNo · Pacer: Yes
  5. Barometric altimeterNo · Pacer: Yes
  6. CompassNo · Pacer: Yes
  7. Thickness11.5 mm vs 10.3 mm+12%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare