vs
5.0Health tracking5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
2.0Poco Watch
| 2.0 | Poco Watch | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 46 mm | 34.4 mm | +11.6 mm |
| Thickness | 13 mm | 10 mm | +3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 2.0 better than Poco Watch?
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 225 mAh+33%
Why is Poco Watch better than 2.0?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)7 days vs 14 days2×
- Thickness13 mm vs 10 mm+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 46 mm | 39 mm |
| Weight | — | 31 g |
| Thickness | 13 mm | 10 mm |
| Height | — | 39.1 mm |
| Width | — | 34.4 mm |
| Case material | Ceramic | Plastic / polymer |
| Lens / cover glass | Mineralglas | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 5 ATM |
| Colours | — | Black, Blue, Ivory |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.6″ |
| Display technology | — | AMOLED |
| Panel | — | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 320 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 360 px |
| Pixel density | — | 301 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | 14 days |
| Battery life (hours) | 168 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 225 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | Accelerometer, heart rate, compass, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
