vs
5.0Health tracking5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
2.0Watch S1 Active
| 2.0 | Watch S1 Active | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 46 mm | 47.3 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 13 mm | 11 mm | +2 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 2.0 better than Watch S1 Active?
2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Watch S1 Active better than 2.0?
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 470 mAh+57%
- Thickness13 mm vs 11 mm+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 46 mm | 46 mm |
| Thickness | 13 mm | 11 mm |
| Height | — | 46.5 mm |
| Width | — | 47.3 mm |
| Case material | Ceramic | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | Mineralglas | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Colours | — | Moon White, Space Black, Ocean Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | — | AMOLED |
| Panel | — | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 466 px |
| Pixel density | — | 326 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | — |
| Battery life (hours) | 168 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 470 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
