Why is Run better than Pro 5?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)12 days vs 3 days4×
- Weight36 g vs 44 g+22%
Why is Pro 5 better than Run?
- Screen size1.32″ vs 1.43″+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 46 mm | — |
| Weight | 36 g | 44 g |
| Thickness | 11.5 mm | — |
| Height | 46 mm | — |
| Width | 46 mm | — |
| Case material | Stainless steel | — |
| Lens / cover glass | Gorilla Glas | Gorilla Glas |
| Strap material | Nylon textile | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.32″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Always-on display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | — |
| Pixel density | 353 ppi | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 12 days | 3 days |
| GPS battery life | 30 h | — |
| GPS battery life (dual-band) | 20 h | — |
| Battery type | rechargeable lithium-ion | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Skin temperature | — | Yes |
| Temperature sensor | Yes | — |
| HRV tracking | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2, temperature, barometer, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Barometric altimeter | Yes | Yes |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Sport profiles | 32 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 1 | Wi-Fi 1 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Music on the watch | — | Yes |
| Storage | — | 32 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Suunto OS | Wear OS by Google |
| Platform | Proprietary | Wear OS |
| Works with | iOS, Android | Android |
