NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah Round vs T-Rex 3

Amazfit Cheetah Round vs Amazfit T-Rex 3

What Cheetah Round does better (3) and where T-Rex 3 wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah Round
Amazfit · 2023Cheetah Round
6.9Score
3 advantages≈ $230
vs
Amazfit T-Rex 3
Amazfit · 2024T-Rex 3
8.4Score
8 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
8.0Display8.3
6.0Battery life6.9
9.7Sports & outdoor9.4
2.2Smart features6.5
4.6Build & durability8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah RoundT-Rex 3
46.7 × 46.711.948.5 × 48.513.8
Cheetah RoundT-Rex 3Difference
Height46.7 mm48.5 mm−1.8 mm
Width46.7 mm48.5 mm−1.8 mm
Thickness11.9 mm13.8 mm−1.8 mm
Weight32 g68 g−36 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah Round better than T-Rex 3?

  1. GPS battery life44 h vs 28 h+57%
  2. Weight32 g vs 68.3 g2.1×
  3. Thickness11.9 mm vs 13.8 mm+16%

Why is T-Rex 3 better than Cheetah Round?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 27 days+93%
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. Screen size1.39″ vs 1.5″+8%
  4. Battery saver mode24 days vs 40 days+67%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)26 h vs 42 h+62%
  6. Battery capacity440 mAh vs 700 mAh+59%
  7. Sport profiles150 vs 170+13%
  8. Resolution (width)454 px vs 480 px+6%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare