NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Pace 4 Pro

Amazfit Falcon vs Coros Pace 4 Pro

What Falcon does better (3) and where Pace 4 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
3 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Coros Pace 4 Pro
Coros · 2026Pace 4 Pro
8.2Score
7 advantages≈ $450
6.6Display8.4
5.3Battery life8.3
9.8Sports & outdoor4.2
9.6Build & durability5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconPace 4 Pro
49.4 × 47.21347.6 × 47.611.8
FalconPace 4 ProDifference
Height47.2 mm47.6 mm−0.4 mm
Width49.4 mm47.6 mm+1.9 mm
Thickness13 mm11.8 mm+1.1 mm
Weight64 g51 g+13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Pace 4 Pro?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 5 ATM4×
  2. Sport profiles160 vs 315.2×
  3. Pixel density326 ppi vs 317 ppi+3%

Why is Pace 4 Pro better than Falcon?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 21 days+50%
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 60 h+58%
  3. Weight64 g vs 51 g+25%
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)21 h vs 40 h+90%
  5. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.47″+15%
  6. Resolution (width)416 px vs 466 px+12%
  7. Thickness13 mm vs 11.8 mm+10%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare