NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Approach S40

Amazfit Falcon vs Garmin Approach S40

What Falcon does better (7) and where Approach S40 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
7 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Garmin Approach S40
Garmin · 2019Approach S40
2 advantages≈ $300
5.3Battery life2.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconApproach S40
49.4 × 47.21343.4 × 43.411.7
FalconApproach S40Difference
Height47.2 mm43.4 mm+3.8 mm
Width49.4 mm43.4 mm+6.1 mm
Thickness13 mm11.7 mm+1.2 mm
Weight64 g43 g+21 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Approach S40?

  1. GPS battery life38 h vs 15 h2.5×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 10 days+40%
  3. Sport profiles160 vs 280×
  4. Sapphire crystalYes · Approach S40: No
  5. Resolution (width)416 px vs 240 px+73%
  6. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.2″+7%
  7. Pixel density326 ppi vs 200 ppi+63%

Why is Approach S40 better than Falcon?

  1. Weight64 g vs 43 g+49%
  2. Thickness13 mm vs 11.7 mm+11%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare