NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Approach S62

Amazfit Falcon vs Garmin Approach S62

What Falcon does better (8) and where Approach S62 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
8 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Garmin Approach S62
Garmin · 2020Approach S62
3.9Score
1 advantage≈ $500
6.6Display3.8
5.3Battery life3.8
9.8Sports & outdoor2.6
9.6Build & durability2.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconApproach S62
49.4 × 47.21347 × 4714.8
FalconApproach S62Difference
Height47.2 mm47 mm+0.2 mm
Width49.4 mm47 mm+2.5 mm
Thickness13 mm14.8 mm−1.9 mm
Weight64 g61 g+3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Approach S62?

  1. GPS battery life38 h vs 20 h+90%
  2. Water resistance20 ATM vs 5 ATM4×
  3. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Approach S62: No
  4. Sport profiles160 vs 198.4×
  5. Sapphire crystalYes · Approach S62: No
  6. Pixel density326 ppi vs 200 ppi+63%
  7. Resolution (width)416 px vs 260 px+60%
  8. Thickness13 mm vs 14.8 mm+14%

Why is Approach S62 better than Falcon?

  1. Weight64 g vs 61 g+5%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare