NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Descent G1

Amazfit Falcon vs Garmin Descent G1

What Falcon does better (7) and where Descent G1 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
7 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Garmin Descent G1
Garmin · 2022Descent G1
5.7Score
2 advantages≈ $550
6.6Display2.6
5.3Battery life6.6
9.8Sports & outdoor4.0
9.6Build & durability9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconDescent G1
49.4 × 47.21345.5 × 45.515.2
FalconDescent G1Difference
Height47.2 mm45.5 mm+1.7 mm
Width49.4 mm45.5 mm+4 mm
Thickness13 mm15.2 mm−2.2 mm
Weight64 g61 g+3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Descent G1?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Descent G1: No
  3. GPS battery life38 h vs 26 h+46%
  4. Sport profiles160 vs 463.5×
  5. Resolution (width)416 px vs 176 px2.4×
  6. Pixel density326 ppi vs 139 ppi2.3×
  7. Thickness13 mm vs 15.2 mm+17%

Why is Descent G1 better than Falcon?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 21 days+50%
  2. Weight64 g vs 61 g+5%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare