NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Enduro

Amazfit Falcon vs Garmin Enduro

What Falcon does better (6) and where Enduro wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
6 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Garmin Enduro
Garmin · 2019Enduro
9.5Score
3 advantages≈ $800
5.3Battery life9.5
9.8Sports & outdoor3.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconEnduro
49.4 × 47.21351 × 5114.9
FalconEnduroDifference
Height47.2 mm51 mm−3.8 mm
Width49.4 mm51 mm−1.5 mm
Thickness13 mm14.9 mm−2 mm
Weight64 g71 g−7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Enduro?

  1. Sport profiles160 vs 325×
  2. Sapphire crystalYes · Enduro: No
  3. Weight64 g vs 71 g+11%
  4. Pixel density326 ppi vs 200 ppi+63%
  5. Resolution (width)416 px vs 280 px+49%
  6. Thickness13 mm vs 14.9 mm+15%

Why is Enduro better than Falcon?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 50 days3.6×
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 70 h+84%
  3. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.4″+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare