NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Fenix 6S

Amazfit Falcon vs Garmin Fenix 6S

What Falcon does better (8) and where Fenix 6S wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
8 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Garmin Fenix 6S
Garmin · 2019Fenix 6S
4.4Score
1 advantage≈ $550
5.3Battery life3.3
9.8Sports & outdoor3.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconFenix 6S
49.4 × 47.21342 × 4213.8
FalconFenix 6SDifference
Height47.2 mm42 mm+5.2 mm
Width49.4 mm42 mm+7.5 mm
Thickness13 mm13.8 mm−0.9 mm
Weight64 g58 g+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Fenix 6S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 9 days+56%
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 25 h+52%
  3. Sport profiles160 vs 394.1×
  4. Sapphire crystalYes · Fenix 6S: No
  5. Resolution (width)416 px vs 240 px+73%
  6. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.2″+7%
  7. Pixel density326 ppi vs 200 ppi+63%
  8. Thickness13 mm vs 13.8 mm+7%

Why is Fenix 6S better than Falcon?

  1. Weight64 g vs 58 g+10%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare