NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Forerunner 265

Amazfit Falcon vs Garmin Forerunner 265

What Falcon does better (6) and where Forerunner 265 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
6 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Garmin Forerunner 265
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 265
4.7Score
1 advantage≈ $450
6.6Display5.0
5.3Battery life3.6
9.8Sports & outdoor5.0
9.6Build & durability2.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconForerunner 265
49.4 × 47.21346.1 × 46.112.9
FalconForerunner 265Difference
Height47.2 mm46.1 mm+1.1 mm
Width49.4 mm46.1 mm+3.4 mm
Thickness13 mm12.9 mm=
Weight64 g47 g+17 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Forerunner 265?

  1. GPS battery life38 h vs 20 h+90%
  2. Water resistance20 ATM vs 5 ATM4×
  3. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 13 days+8%
  4. Sport profiles160 vs 582.8×
  5. Sapphire crystalYes · Forerunner 265: No
  6. GPS battery life (dual-band)21 h vs 14 h+50%

Why is Forerunner 265 better than Falcon?

  1. Weight64 g vs 47 g+36%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare