NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Forerunner 265S

Amazfit Falcon vs Garmin Forerunner 265S

What Falcon does better (7) and where Forerunner 265S wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
7 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Garmin Forerunner 265S
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 265S
5.2Score
2 advantages≈ $450
6.6Display5.0
5.3Battery life3.9
9.8Sports & outdoor5.0
9.6Build & durability3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconForerunner 265S
49.4 × 47.21341.7 × 41.712.9
FalconForerunner 265SDifference
Height47.2 mm41.7 mm+5.5 mm
Width49.4 mm41.7 mm+7.8 mm
Thickness13 mm12.9 mm=
Weight64 g39 g+25 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Forerunner 265S?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 5 ATM4×
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 24 h+58%
  3. Sport profiles160 vs 582.8×
  4. Sapphire crystalYes · Forerunner 265S: No
  5. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.1″+16%
  6. GPS battery life (dual-band)21 h vs 15 h+40%
  7. Resolution (width)416 px vs 360 px+16%

Why is Forerunner 265S better than Falcon?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 15 days+7%
  2. Weight64 g vs 39 g+64%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare