NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Forerunner 945 LTE

Amazfit Falcon vs Garmin Forerunner 945 LTE

What Falcon does better (9) and where Forerunner 945 LTE wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
9 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Garmin Forerunner 945 LTE
Garmin · 2021Forerunner 945 LTE
4.4Score
1 advantage≈ $600
6.6Display2.9
5.3Battery life5.2
9.8Sports & outdoor5.2
9.6Build & durability2.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconForerunner 945 LTE
49.4 × 47.21344.4 × 44.413.9
FalconForerunner 945 LTEDifference
Height47.2 mm44.4 mm+2.8 mm
Width49.4 mm44.4 mm+5.1 mm
Thickness13 mm13.9 mm−1 mm
Weight64 g49 g+15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Forerunner 945 LTE?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 5 ATM4×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Forerunner 945 LTE: No
  3. Sport profiles160 vs 602.7×
  4. GPS battery life38 h vs 35 h+9%
  5. Sapphire crystalYes · Forerunner 945 LTE: No
  6. Resolution (width)416 px vs 240 px+73%
  7. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.2″+7%
  8. Pixel density326 ppi vs 200 ppi+63%
  9. Thickness13 mm vs 13.9 mm+7%

Why is Forerunner 945 LTE better than Falcon?

  1. Weight64 g vs 49 g+31%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare